PHCC PHACT Service Review System

1) Please provide a description of any changes to the services under review since the last cycle and the appropriate updates to the catalog. In addition, include any location, personnel, and personnel role changes, as well as additions, losses, or modifications to the types of services offered.

2) How do students or employees engage the service(s)? Please provide examples of activities, marketing materials, or other outreach and engagement examples designed to inform students or employees of the service.

1) Goals template data, aggregated by strategic plan reporting area (see attached template).

Please reflect on the goals from previous cycles. Are they still relevant? Should new goals be added? Please create minimum of three measurable goals.

Increase number and quality of applicants by promoting opportunity and assisting with applications. Increase amount of funding available to be awarded.
Utilize listservs, partner organizations, and subscription to FoundationSearch.com to identify new grant funding opportunities.
Target grant opportunities that fit the mission and goals of the college.
Communicate grant application process across campus and recruit buy-in and assistance on grant projects from faculty and staff.
Collaborate with local and regional partners on large-scale grant applications.

2) Based on the goals data, please provide examples and a description of how the services under review promote efficiency for the institution (to include academic programs, if applicable).

1) Based on the aggregated data, please provide the areas of the strategic plan (specific to the service) that were the strongest and weakest. Provide an explanation for the reasoning.

2) Based on the student satisfaction and/or employee satisfaction survey results, please provide the strongest and weakest areas. Provide an explanation for these results.


Survey Question (100 point scale, sample size is in parenthesis)	ADJ Rating	CLSF Rating	F12 Rating	F9M Rating	Wage Rating
Requests for assistance with grant applications are responded to in a timely manner.	FA 21 0	FA 21 89/(2)	FA 21 100/(7)	FA 21 98/(2)	FA 21 0
Grant funds impact the area I work in.	FA 21 0	FA 21 77/(2)	FA 21 98.83/(6)	FA 21 75.5/(2)	FA 21 0
I have confidence in the college’s ability to prepare competitive grant proposals.	FA 21 0	FA 21 89.5/(2)	FA 21 99/(7)	FA 21 96/(2)	FA 21 0
I have confidence in the college’s ability to correctly spend funds and follow reporting guidelines.	FA 21 0	FA 21 64.5/(2)	FA 21 97.28/(7)	FA 21 90.5/(2)	FA 21 0
I have confidence in completing the application process for the PHCC Foundation Mini Grant.	FA 21 0	FA 21 100/(2)	FA 21 94.6/(5)	FA 21 75.5/(2)	FA 21 0

1) How do personnel in this service area plan to address weaker areas throughout the next review cycle for both, the strategic plan and student/employee satisfaction?

2) What changes are expected in this service area (major expenditures, changes, personnel needs, future costs)?

3) Any other pertinent information relevant to the review process should be provided here (e.g. community need, state/federal requirements, external accreditation, budgetary issues, etc.)